[ietf-nntp] Re: SASL capability

[Russ Allbery]

Jeffrey M Vinocur <jeff at litech.org> writes:
> On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, Ken Murchison wrote:
>> Clive D.W. Feather wrote:

>>> I think that advertising "I do SASL but have no methods that I'm
>>> willing to offer you right now" is a good idea, so "AUTHINFO SASL:".

>> Any other thoughts on this?  Currently, both server implementations 
>> (Cyrus and INN) only report "SASL:" when mechanisms are available.

> I concur with Clive here.

Clive's approach sounds fine to me too.

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra at stanford.edu)             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>