[ietf-nntp] Extension documents

[Ken Murchison]

Clive D.W. Feather wrote:
> I'd like to make a recommendation for some general wording for extension
> documents, including both AUTHINFO, TLS, and anything to follow. The idea
> is to encourage consistency. Opinions?
> 
> Here are my proposals:
> 
> In the introduction, include:
> 
>     This specification is to be read in conjunction with the NNTP base
>     specification [NNTP]. Except where specifically stated otherwise, in
>     the case of a conflict between these two documents [NNTP] takes
>     precedence over this one.
> 
> If only one extension is described in the document:
...
> 
> If more than one extension is described in the document:

What about something like AUTHINFO where there is one extension, with 
two command variants which can be implemented independent of one another?

-- 
Kenneth Murchison     Oceana Matrix Ltd.
Software Engineer     21 Princeton Place
716-662-8973 x26      Orchard Park, NY 14127
--PGP Public Key--    http://www.oceana.com/~ken/ksm.pgp