ietf-nntp Re: Last major open issue (48x return codes)

[Clive D.W. Feather]

Russ Allbery said:
>> Isn't 483 already in use for STARTTLS implementations (as documented by
>> Jeff), or is INN the only one?
> So far as I know, INN is the only implementation (and isn't using 483
> properly yet).

Just out of interest, why is it 483 rather than 481?

[This is just my spirit of neatness speaking.]

-- 
Clive D.W. Feather  | Work:  <clive at demon.net>   | Tel:    +44 20 8495 6138
Internet Expert     | Home:  <clive at davros.org>  | *** NOTE CHANGE ***
Demon Internet      | WWW: http://www.davros.org | Fax:    +44 870 051 9937
Thus plc            |                            | Mobile: +44 7973 377646