ietf-nntp LIST EXTENSION caching, latest wording
Charles Lindsey
chl at clerew.man.ac.uk
Tue Oct 14 02:25:40 PDT 2003
In <Pine.LNX.4.55L-032.0310130929360.5901 at mail-ldap3.andrew.cmu.edu> Rob Siemborski <rjs3 at andrew.cmu.edu> writes:
>*If* the consensus is that we must include text about caching
>(which I think causes more problems than it solves), then something more like
> others will appear and dissapear depending on state changes within
>the session. An NNTP client MAY cache the results of this command, but
>MUST NOT rely on any cached results - from previous sessions or across
>session state changes that are documented to potentially invalidate
>the LIST EXTENSIONS response - remaining correct.
>would probably be better.
Much better, and I will even concede that is an appropriate use of MUST in
a Security Considerations section.
--
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl at clerew.man.ac.uk Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5
More information about the ietf-nntp
mailing list