ietf-nntp 32/64 bit question
Charles Lindsey
chl at clerew.man.ac.uk
Mon Oct 13 17:35:07 PDT 2003
In <20031012090613.GE23726 at finch-staff-1.thus.net> "Clive D.W. Feather" <clive at demon.net> writes:
>The way to do it is for you to define a BIGNUM extension. Then a server can
>respond
> 401 BIGNUM Article numbers exceed 2**32
Or you could say servers SHOULD do it.
Or, if partial compliance is too big a stigma to carry, perhaps some
weasel words could be written to say that implementors "Ought" to try to
do better.
But I don't think we want to push any harder than that at the present time
(certainly not if we have 2000 years to do it in).
--
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl at clerew.man.ac.uk Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5
More information about the ietf-nntp
mailing list