ietf-nntp Draft 20 pre-release 2

[Rob Siemborski]

On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Ken Murchison wrote:

> I propose that we remove ALL reference to caching and be done with it.
> It sounds like client authors are going to do what they want anyways, so
> why encourage or discourage them.
[snip]
> Let's just avoid the subject in the base document altogether (like the
> IMAP and POP RFCs), and we're done.

Not discussing caching in the base document is fine with me, and probably
less confusing in the long run.

-Rob

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Rob Siemborski | Andrew Systems Group * Research Systems Programmer
PGP:0x5CE32FCC | Cyert Hall 207 * rjs3 at andrew.cmu.edu * 412.268.7456
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----
Version: 3.12
GCS/IT/CM/PA d- s+: a-- C++++$ ULS++++$ P+++$ L+++(++++) E W+ N o? K-
w O- M-- V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+ t+@ 5+++ R@ tv-@ b+ DI+++ G e h r- y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----