ietf-nntp Generic Response Codes wording

[Russ Allbery]

Peter Robinson <pmrobinson at gmx.net> writes:

> I suggest this:

>   With the exception of the 500 response to mandatory commands,
>   the client MUST be prepared to receive any of these responses
>   for any command.

> [ Is it appropriate to suggest wording changes such as this to 'stable'
>   sections at this stage? ]

Since we have another draft coming out, I think it's fine, personally,
particularly for things like this that are small and self-contained.  This
change seems fine to me.

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra at stanford.edu)             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>