ietf-nntp Draft 20 pre-release 2

[Rob Siemborski]

On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Ken Murchison wrote:

> > No.  But if we go down that route, I'd be happier with SHOULD send and
> > SHOULD NOT cache (and perhaps MUST NOT cache security extensions).
>
> This is the language that I have been in favor or all along.  This is in
> line with the other messaging protocols.

I agree.  (preferring the MUST NOT cache security extensions).

-Rob

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Rob Siemborski | Andrew Systems Group * Research Systems Programmer
PGP:0x5CE32FCC | Cyert Hall 207 * rjs3 at andrew.cmu.edu * 412.268.7456
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----
Version: 3.12
GCS/IT/CM/PA d- s+: a-- C++++$ ULS++++$ P+++$ L+++(++++) E W+ N o? K-
w O- M-- V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+ t+@ 5+++ R@ tv-@ b+ DI+++ G e h r- y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----