ietf-nntp Article concepts
Russ Allbery
rra at stanford.edu
Mon Mar 31 13:10:15 PST 2003
Clive D W Feather <clive at demon.net> writes:
> Russ Allbery said:
>> I included the space in my proposed wording intentionally, since if you
>> read through the descriptions of various commands, you'll find that our
>> current standard assumes that it will always be there. There are
>> various references to it in, for example, the OVER and HDR
>> descriptions.
>> Those descriptions could potentially be rewritten to not make that
>> assumption, but I'm not sure if it's worth it.
> Indeed. In particular, if there are two or more spaces, we currently say
> that the first one *only* is removed from the overview content. Would
> that still be the case?
I think it should be (although I think INN does something strange here
currently, I don't think that's wise or should be standardized).
I'll move all the stuff related to message IDs into a separate message.
--
Russ Allbery (rra at stanford.edu) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
More information about the ietf-nntp
mailing list