ietf-nntp Message IDs
Charles Lindsey
chl at clw.cs.man.ac.uk
Wed Mar 19 03:43:10 PST 2003
In <yladfumrgt.fsf at windlord.stanford.edu> Russ Allbery <rra at stanford.edu> writes:
>7. Article posting and retrieval
> I don't think we should refer to RFC 2822 here, or in fact require a
> particular message ID syntax. NNTP can at least theoretically be used
> for storing any messages with a vaguely mail-like syntax. I would
> therefore replace the end of this section with:
> Message-ids are, in this specification, opaque identifiers inside
> angle brackets that uniquely identify messages. They must satisfy the
> following restrictions:
Yes, this approach is fine. Essentially, you either define message-ids
very broadly, and say "octets much match" and "other standards may provide
more restrictions/conventions", or else you describe their syntax in
excruciating detail. Problem was the present draft was somewhere in the
middle.
...
> Message-ids are compared octet by octet by the NNTP protocol, and a
> particular octet sequence is considered to be a different message-id
> than any other, differing octet sequence regardless of the semantics
> of that sequence of octets in any other protocol. As an example, the
> message-ids:
> <"abcd"@example.com>
> <"ab\cd"@example.com>
But it is essential to say that, and the examples are there to explain why
it is important.
--
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl at clw.cs.man.ac.uk Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5
More information about the ietf-nntp
mailing list