ietf-nntp Draft 17 pre-2
Clive D. W. Feather
clive at on-the-train.demon.co.uk
Thu Feb 27 09:08:05 PST 2003
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In message <yladgkruka.fsf at windlord.stanford.edu>, Russ Allbery
<rra at stanford.edu> writes
>I think we should bypass this entire debate and just not standardize LIST
>OVERVIEW.FMT at all. The information that it provides isn't very useful,
>and worse is deceptively useful (in other words, it looks like it's more
>useful than it actually is).
It's the only way to find out all of what is in the overview database -
using OVER on any given article doesn't tell you that, it only tells you
what fields are in that article. So it does have some use.
[Haven't we done this before.]
We could remove the legacy feature completely and just say existing
servers are non-conforming. Or we could say that the first 7 lines can
contain any old rubbish because the OVER command doesn't have a choice
for the corresponding fields. Or we could even leave it as is; if we're
going to worry about infelicities, I'd rather change LISTGROUP to use a
different response to 211.
[Which reminds me, could we do something like require all future
extensions to use 6xx for multiline responses? Or is that too far?]
- --
Clive D.W. Feather | Internet Expert | Work: <clive at demon.net>
Tel: +44 20 8371 1138 | Demon Internet | Home: <clive at davros.org>
Fax: +44 870 051 9937 | Thus plc | Web: <http://www.davros.org>
Written on my laptop; please observe the Reply-To address
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPsdk 2.0.5
iQEVAwUBPl5F9CNAHP3TFZrhAQFiigf+LoPOOzIaX2kPKg71O6rgL0cjgIN24zYF
92G7Bfmjkxh5D/TFJcmnSlTTdffjkJZfrNIGb3WSfmGE0J8S7UmAB/5QrexgAh4K
2OUDZBnyljo7K+/OjBl9sN5VqHLBnLLUtGw7VR3FM/K2HBYZsKydWtx0m2dqs+/B
z/8m3yqKzXENsvx5fmx8xcB0J7/51XmKacrn+gF18slndobPut2HjgU2+X4dNupo
V7FWKmgp2cj0LvO1arcLGYFJkXUYJtPTkuvz0z9TRI21Qjo13Cjh02FtuUQ4Tufa
OrgxCkWovNtbk4q5/TYavLYZW5fqusfK5w/Y8XaD+nSVzqGo36fuxg==
=9koj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the ietf-nntp
mailing list