[ietf-nntp] OVER message-id

[Russ Allbery]

Ken Murchison <ken at oceana.com> writes:
> Clive D.W. Feather wrote:

>>> DO you want a parameter in the LIST EXTENSIONS result to say whether
>>> it is implemented, or do you just try it and see whether you get a 5xx
>>> response?

> Rather than clutter the OVER and HDR capabilities, I'd suggest just
> returning a 503 response.

I'm leaning that way too.  Any strong objections?

I agree with Ken that 503 makes more sense here; it's an optional facility
not provided by the server, not an unrecognized command or syntax error.

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra at stanford.edu)             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>