[ietf-nntp] :bytes metadata
Charles Lindsey
chl at clerew.man.ac.uk
Mon Dec 22 04:12:47 PST 2003
In <3FE30A49.6070906 at oceana.com> Ken Murchison <ken at oceana.com> writes:
>Agreed. But if we're just going to state that its a <= approximation,
>we probably don't need to get into the storage format. If what we're
>saying is true, then the client shouldn't/won't care whether its stored
>in wire format, canonical format, base64 encoded or AES encrypted, as
>long as its gets a reasonable estimate of the canonical size.
I think you would get a rather poor estimate using base64, but I don't
think our protocol gives that option (or not in a manner visible to the
user).
--
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl at clerew.man.ac.uk Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5
More information about the ietf-nntp
mailing list