[ietf-nntp] :bytes metadata
Charles Lindsey
chl at clerew.man.ac.uk
Fri Dec 19 09:12:56 PST 2003
In <20031218114438.GA75903 at finch-staff-1.thus.net> "Clive D.W. Feather" <clive at demon.net> writes:
>(2) Should dot-stuffing be counted?
>(3) Should the final '.' CRLF be counted?
>In other words, do we see :bytes as indicating the size of the article in
>"canonical" form, or the number of octets that will come down the line in
>response to ARTICLE?
>My inclination is to say that the answers to (2) and (3) are "no"; the
>value is a storage octet count rather than a wire octet count.
I agree. If I ask for the metadata size, and shortly thereafter retrieve
and store the full article, then I would feel cheated if the article
turned out to be other than as predicted.
>I'm not sure what to do about (1). I can think of four possible fixes:
>(A) Say that the value applies to the current session and note that, while
> it SHOULD be constant across sessions, there are cases when it isn't.
And if I retrieve the article in the same session as I retrieved the
metadata, then presumably I am getting it from the same server in the
cluster. I.e., in one session, I should get a consistent view of what is
stored in the server. If this forces the implementor to keep me assigned
to a single server during a session, then so be it.
--
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl at clerew.man.ac.uk Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5
More information about the ietf-nntp
mailing list