ietf-nntp Status report

[Clive D.W. Feather]

Russ Allbery said:
>> * Added one about the 480/483 issue.
> 
> I like Ken's proposal.  Document that all codes of the form 48x, when
> returned from regular commands, mean that this command is unavailable
> unless some authentication or privacy extension is used.  Does anyone
> object to that approach?

I certainly can't think of anything better at the moment, and I've added it
to the outstanding issue block.

I have this feeling at the back of my mind that solving this is tied in, in
some way, with the "informal extensions" issue I raised the other day. If
and when I figure out how, I'll say more.

-- 
Clive D.W. Feather  | Work:  <clive at demon.net>   | Tel:    +44 20 8495 6138
Internet Expert     | Home:  <clive at davros.org>  | *** NOTE CHANGE ***
Demon Internet      | WWW: http://www.davros.org | Fax:    +44 870 051 9937
Thus plc            |                            | Mobile: +44 7973 377646