ietf-nntp Response code issues
Russ Allbery
rra at stanford.edu
Sun Apr 13 18:11:06 PDT 2003
Jeffrey M Vinocur <jeff at litech.org> writes:
> On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Personally, I'm leaning towards just documenting 480 as a generic
>> response code for insufficient authentication or transport security,
>> with a second choice of documenting 480 and 483 as generic response
>> codes, and everything else seems less good.
> I don't suppose we have any consensus on this, such that I can move
> forward with a new version of the TLS draft...
Not really at the moment, but I'd love to hear opinions.
--
Russ Allbery (rra at stanford.edu) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
More information about the ietf-nntp
mailing list