ietf-nntp Response code issues

Russ Allbery rra at stanford.edu
Sun Apr 13 18:11:06 PDT 2003


Jeffrey M Vinocur <jeff at litech.org> writes:
> On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Russ Allbery wrote:

>> Personally, I'm leaning towards just documenting 480 as a generic
>> response code for insufficient authentication or transport security,
>> with a second choice of documenting 480 and 483 as generic response
>> codes, and everything else seems less good.

> I don't suppose we have any consensus on this, such that I can move 
> forward with a new version of the TLS draft...

Not really at the moment, but I'd love to hear opinions.

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra at stanford.edu)             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>



More information about the ietf-nntp mailing list