ietf-nntp CONSENSUS POLL -- PLEASE READ AND RESPOND NO LATER THAN 1400 CST 17 March 2002 (that +6:00 GMT for those that don't know what CST is)

[Stan O Barber]

All votes here are relative to draft-ietf-nntp-base-15.txt. If you have 
not  read this document, please don't participate in this vote. You will 
have opportunities to participate in the next one.

Please remove DISAGREE and leave AGREE if you AGREE with the question. 
If you DISAGREE, remove AGREE and comment on why you disagree.

Please send all responses to "vote at academ.houston.tx.us" no later than 
1400 CST 17 March 2002. Votes received after that time will not be 
counted. Results will be used in producing draft-ietf-nntp-base-16.txt.

Thanks for your participation.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


UTF-8

Should UTF-8 BNF in the document be changed to:

    UTF-8-non-ascii = UTF8-2 / UTF8-3 / UTF8-4
    UTF8-1 = %x80-BF
    UTF8-2 = %xC2-DF UTF8-1
    UTF8-3 = %xE0 %xA0-BF UTF8-1 / %xE1-EC 2UTF8-1 /
             %xED %x80-9F UTF8-1 / %xEE-EF 2UTF8-1
    UTF8-4 = %xF0 %x90-BF 2UTF8-1 / %xF1-F3 3UTF8-1 /
             %xF4 %x80-8F 2UTF8-1

AGREE 
     DISAGREE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Overview

In the response to the OVER command, should bytes and lines be 
calculated in real-time using the entire article (body and headers)?

AGREE 
     DISAGREE

Should blank mandatory headers return a value of ""?

AGREE 
     DISAGREE

Should optional headers that have no contents (or are missing) return a 
value of  "LABLE:"?

AGREE 
     DISAGREE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
REPONSE CODE 502

Should this response code be limited to permission/authorization 
failures only?

AGREE 
    DISAGREE

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LISTGROUP

Should LISTGROUP be eliminated from the base spec?

AGREE 
    DISAGREE


If DISAGREE, should the 211 response code in LISTGROUP be changed to 
another code?

AGREE 
    DISAGREE