ietf-nntp GROUP Responses (was: Commetns on draft-15.pdf)
Charles Lindsey
chl at clw.cs.man.ac.uk
Wed Jan 2 03:56:07 PST 2002
In <20020101224235.D49197 at demon.net> "Clive D.W. Feather" <clive at demon.net> writes:
>Let's put it in protocol terms.
>(1) If the requested group does not exist, is the GROUP command allowed to
>select a "related" group and return its details ? [Ignore the question of
>what "related" means.]
Different servers seem to do different things, so I thing it has to be a
"MAY" if you want to be specific.
>If NO, then an aliased group must produce a 411 result. If YES, then:
>(2) If a related group is selected, should the 211 response include the
>original group name or the name of the related group ?
>(3) If the answer to (2) is the original name, then is there any way to
>find out what the related group is ?
Not AFAICS. Which is why I think it better to give the new name in cases
where that makes sense.
--
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl at clw.cs.man.ac.uk Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5
More information about the ietf-nntp
mailing list