ietf-nntp Concerning Streaming

[Stan Barber]

The proposal was to call it streaming and the text was in the original 
poll document. I don't recall any consensus to change it to pipelining 
and there was concern at the IETF meeting that it might be confused with 
the SMTP extension if we called it pipelining.

Clive D.W. Feather wrote:

> Stan O. Barber said:
> 
>>There was clear consensus on adding section on streaming suggested by 
>>Clive Feather, so it will be added to the 15th revision of the draft as 
>>section 4.2. There will be an additional sentence at the end of the 
>>third paragraph stating that the server MUST process commands in the 
>>order they were sent.
>>
> 
> I have added this to my proposed text, and changed the terminology to
> "pipelined". I still have two alternate forms; did we agree on which one is
> to be used ?
> 
> <http://www.davros.org/nntp-texts/section-4.2.txt>
>