ietf-nntp Questions about changes from Russ' site

Stan O Barber sob at academ.com
Tue Nov 20 15:54:55 PST 2001


Much thanks. I think you meant 9.3.1 instead of 9.1.3 below since that 
is what matched up.

These changes are now in the draft I am finishing up.

I think I got everything in there now.

Russ Allbery wrote:

> Stan O Barber <sob at academ.com> writes:
> 
> 
>>I have questions about http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/nntp/proposed/015.
>>
> 
>>I am not sure what text this is supposed to replace or where it should
>>add to the document.
>>
> 
> The first section is supposed to completely replace the long paragraph in
> section 4 that starts with:
> 
>     Each response MUST start with a three-digit response code that 
>     is sufficient to distinguish all responses. Certain valid 
>     responses are defined to be multi-line; for all others, the 
>     response is contained in a single line.
> 
> The POST language is supposed to completely replace the second paragraph
> in section 9.1.3, the one that begins:
> 
>     If posting is permitted, the article MUST be presented to the 
>     server by the client in the format specified by RFC 1036.
> 
> The IHAVE language is supposed to completely replace the second paragraph
> in section 9.3.2, the one that begins:
> 
>     If transmission of the article is requested, the client MUST 
>     send the entire article,
> 
> 





More information about the ietf-nntp mailing list