ietf-nntp Questions about changes from Russ' site
Stan O Barber
sob at academ.com
Tue Nov 20 15:54:55 PST 2001
Much thanks. I think you meant 9.3.1 instead of 9.1.3 below since that
is what matched up.
These changes are now in the draft I am finishing up.
I think I got everything in there now.
Russ Allbery wrote:
> Stan O Barber <sob at academ.com> writes:
>
>
>>I have questions about http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/nntp/proposed/015.
>>
>
>>I am not sure what text this is supposed to replace or where it should
>>add to the document.
>>
>
> The first section is supposed to completely replace the long paragraph in
> section 4 that starts with:
>
> Each response MUST start with a three-digit response code that
> is sufficient to distinguish all responses. Certain valid
> responses are defined to be multi-line; for all others, the
> response is contained in a single line.
>
> The POST language is supposed to completely replace the second paragraph
> in section 9.1.3, the one that begins:
>
> If posting is permitted, the article MUST be presented to the
> server by the client in the format specified by RFC 1036.
>
> The IHAVE language is supposed to completely replace the second paragraph
> in section 9.3.2, the one that begins:
>
> If transmission of the article is requested, the client MUST
> send the entire article,
>
>
More information about the ietf-nntp
mailing list