ietf-nntp Re: reorganising the document
Lee Kindness
lkindness at csl.co.uk
Thu Jan 11 03:07:51 PST 2001
Clive D.W. Feather writes:
> Stan O. Barber said:
> >> What does this mean ? And whatever it is, does "no sense" mean "people
> >> objected" (and, if so, why ?) or just "no-one is bothered either way" ?
> > When asked, people didn't think that doing significant document
> > reorganization (such as the one you suggested) was warranted.
> I see. Do you have any feeling why this was the case ? From my point of
> view, it seems to be much easier to locate stuff, the ordering seems more
> logical, and it only took about 10 minutes to do.
> I'm surprised people think that LIST OVERVIEW.FMT is closer related to
> ARTICLE than NEWNEWS is to either, but I can't travel 6000 miles just to
> put that argument.
I'm inclined to agree with Clive on this point. The reorganisation
makes the document a lot easier to read and is more 'natural' in its
ordering.
I think the majority of those who contribute to the list would agree
with me. Why should a meeting of a small number of people in San Diego
take precedence?
Lee.
More information about the ietf-nntp
mailing list