ietf-nntp Minor corrections to 11.4

[Charles Lindsey]

In <yl3djka6vh.fsf at windlord.stanford.edu> Russ Allbery <rra at stanford.edu> writes:

>       Clients SHOULD use the eight-digit date form with four digits for
>       the year.  The six-digit form is provided solely for backwards
>       compatibility.

>I'd even be comfortable with making that a MUST, but existing practice
>definitely supports a SHOULD.

I agree. In the days when there might have been some expectation of
getting this spec out of the door before Y2k happened, it made some sense
to continue to accept 2 digits. No longer so.

Various early versions of INN (inlcuding one server I sometimes connect
to) interpret the 2 digit form incorrectly since y2k, as does the model
NNTP implementation. So when people fix those bugs, they might as well
switch to 4 digits regardless and save the hassle of that "nearest the
current year" hack (which is a bit of a pig to implement).

-- 
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Email:     chl at clw.cs.man.ac.uk  Web:   http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Voice/Fax: +44 161 437 4506      Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9     Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7  65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5