ietf-nntp UTC (was: Minor corrections to 11.4)

[Russ Allbery]

Lee Kindness <lkindness at csl.co.uk> writes:

> In addition to your comments, I think it is important that "UTC" is
> dropped from the draft. It does not add anything - it is only a cosmetic
> update. It also introduces incompatibilities.

I don't much care one way or the other; INN 2.3 supports it (and was the
first released version of INN that did so, I believe).  It's only
cosmetic, but it's not hard to support in the server.

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra at stanford.edu)             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>