ietf-nntp Section 11.5 - NEWNEWS
Clive D.W. Feather
clive at demon.net
Wed Nov 22 01:27:54 PST 2000
Paul Overell said:
> I am arguing that as the authors of RFC977 did not discuss timescales in
> specifying NEWNEWS and NEWGROUPS they were, therefore, assuming that the
> time and date were in the normal, everyday, common or garden timescale.
> This is UTC, not GMT. Their use of the token "GMT" was as a timezone
> not as a timescale.
I think we should fudge the wording. Both because we can't be sure of which
time scale machines will be using, and because:
>> But if my client allows 3 minutes and the server is out by 5 minutes I'm in
>> trouble anyway. What is a sensible aount of slack ? We should say.
>
> Turnpike uses 10 min slack if the client has not synchronized its clock
> with a time server, and 2 min slack if it has.
But how do you know those are safe values either ? That's why I think we
should explicitly say what's acceptable.
--
Clive D.W. Feather | Work: <clive at demon.net> | Tel: +44 20 8371 1138
Internet Expert | Home: <clive at davros.org> | Fax: +44 20 8371 1037
Demon Internet | WWW: http://www.davros.org | DFax: +44 20 8371 4037
Thus plc | | Mobile: +44 7973 377646
More information about the ietf-nntp
mailing list