ietf-nntp Draft summary of IETF 48 meeting

[Russ Allbery]

Andrew Gierth <andrew at erlenstar.demon.co.uk> writes:

> INN's behaviour is in line with its predecessors (other than perhaps in
> its handling of CRs), as I understand it from the somewhat sketchy
> documentation available (e.g. newsoverview.3 in C News). The collapsing
> of non-printing sequences appears to have been introduced on this list;
> the wording change that avoided collapsing printable whitespace
> sequences was in response to an objection from me.

What do Diablo and Typhoon do?  I think we should probably just go with
existing practice here, provided that existing practice isn't seriously
broken in some way.

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra at stanford.edu)             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>