ietf-nntp Response codes - debugging, authentication & unknown
Lee Kindness
lkindness at csl.co.uk
Mon Aug 14 01:26:02 PDT 2000
Clive D.W. Feather writes:
> http://www.davros.org/nntp-texts/section-4.txt
> Can you live with the results ? It would be nice not to have rival
> proposals that need to be merged.
I believe that irons out most of the issues.
> I still have one outstanding problem with the main text:
> > A server MUST respond to a command issued when
> > the session is in an incorrect state by responding with a
> > negative status indicator. This may be from either the 4xx or
> > 5xx group as appropriate.
> Is this meant to mean that a server can issue *any* of these two hundred
> codes whenever it likes ? Or is it meant to mean that each command
> documents specific "incorrect state" responses. Or something else ?
The wording should be clarified to make it clear that only the codes
documented for each command are valid.
> The other thing I note is that a lot of commands have a 502 response
> defined as "service unavailable". It seems to me that this actually
And 503 too?
More information about the ietf-nntp
mailing list