ietf-nntp Response codes - debugging, authentication & unknown
Russ Allbery
rra at stanford.edu
Fri Aug 11 11:28:19 PDT 2000
Clive D W Feather <clive at demon.net> writes:
> I still have one outstanding problem with the main text:
>> A server MUST respond to a command issued when
>> the session is in an incorrect state by responding with a
>> negative status indicator. This may be from either the 4xx or
>> 5xx group as appropriate.
> Is this meant to mean that a server can issue *any* of these two hundred
> codes whenever it likes ? Or is it meant to mean that each command
> documents specific "incorrect state" responses. Or something else ?
I would hope that it means each command would specify the status code in
its description.
> The other thing I note is that a lot of commands have a 502 response
> defined as "service unavailable". It seems to me that this actually
> means "you are not permitted to execute this command (with these
> arguments)". Should that be a general response described in 4.1 (just
> like 501 for parsing errors is), rather than with each command ?
I would be in favor of that.
--
Russ Allbery (rra at stanford.edu) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
More information about the ietf-nntp
mailing list