Comments: draft-ietf-nntpext-base-06-txt
Clive D.W. Feather
clive at on-the-train.demon.co.uk
Fri Nov 6 21:27:36 PST 1998
In message <yam7612.1552.2016172704 at post.demon.co.uk>, Bill Godfrey
<bill at bacchae.demon.co.uk> writes
>Suggestion, words to the effect of...
>
>The dat is sent as 8 digits in the format CCYYMMDD, where CCYY is the year
>in 4 digits, MM is the two digits of the the month (with leading zero
>if appropiate) and DD is the day of the month (with leading zero if
>appropiate).
>
>If a six digit year is given by old or non-compliant software, the date
>MUST be taken as above, but with the century is assumed to be the current
>century, if YY is smaller than or equal to the current year, otherwise
>the year us from the previous century.
Surely better is:
the century is assumed to be the current century if that would make
the date and time no later than the present, and the previous
century otherwise.
?
--
Clive D.W. Feather | Regulation Officer, LINX | Work: <clive at linx.org>
Tel: +44 1733 705000 | (on secondment from | Home: <cdwf at i.am>
Fax: +44 1733 353929 | Demon Internet) | <http://i.am/davros>
Written on my laptop; please observe the Reply-To address
More information about the ietf-nntp
mailing list