ietf-nntp Initial draft FINALLY available

[Rich Salz]

>Nothing in the document (as written) precludes it operating on any other
>port. The document (as written) requires it to use 119 if it is to
>be compliant with the document. It seems that MUST should become SHOULD
>given the messages I have seen so far. More comments from others?

No.  MUST becomes "see elsewhere for the assignment of protocols to ports."

As the Buddhists say, mu.  Unask the question.
	/r$