XBATCH Command (Was: Re: New NNTP extensions in INN 1.5?)
Stan Barber
sob at academ.com
Mon Jul 15 14:21:43 PDT 1996
The charter we discussed at the BOF is the following:
1.Revise and publish a standards-track successor to RFC 977 that would
remove ambiguities from the original document, add a mechanism for
adding standards-track extensions to the protocol and providing a
mechanism for the server to inform the client of which extensions it
supports.
2.Include in the same document some reasonable group of existing commonly
used extensions forming a new base functionality for NNTP
3.Upon completion of the RFC977 successor document and with the approval
of the Applications Area Directorate, select a new standards-track
extension for NNTP and test the newly established mechanism for
adding extensions.
Unlike the previous WG, this will not invent technology, but rather
establish a new baseline for what NNTP is and should be going forward.
It will also establish a mechanism for continuting the development of NNTP
in which new technology can be added.
The Appliacation ADs wanted a set of attainable goals that could be achived
in a 9 - 16 month timeframe. Hopefully, these can be attained because they
do not involve the development of lots of new technology.
--
Stan | Academ Consulting Services |internet: sob at academ.com
Olan | For more info on academ, see this |uucp: {mcsun|amdahl}!academ!sob
Barber | URL- http://www.academ.com/academ |Opinions expressed are only mine.
More information about the ietf-nntp
mailing list