LNH/REVIEW: Kid Review's Roundup - May 2014
Tom Russell
joltcity at gmail.com
Sat Jun 7 13:58:15 PDT 2014
Quoth the Perron:
>
> "So... in the past, Tom's written some really funny stuff - amazing
>
> kneeslapper gags and character humor. But often - and I think Tom will
>
> agree here - the humor was *mean*, a lot of it coming from characters
>
> being inventively cruel to each other. This, however - this story is not
>
> only less mean, but *more interesting* for it."
Well, with the Master Blaster stories-- which I just binge re-read the other day-- yes, they were definitely mean, mostly because of my interpretation of the character as a psychotic bully. Outside of stories featuring Master Blaster (and to a degree his foil WikiBoy), I don't think I tended towards meanness necessarily.
> "Like, Julie. Under many pens, the Julie/Max relationship would become
>
> the absurdly stereotypical sitcom couple where he's dumb and she's
>
> bitchy and hurr hurr hurr. In this case, though, while there are a few
>
> moments where her lines feel like petty sniping, the majority of them
>
> stay in the much more interesting realm of snappy patter, comebacks and
>
> insults where the emphasis is on humor through cleverness rather than
>
> cruelty. And this in turn makes it feel more like a relationship where
>
> the participants care about each other and have learned and grown from
>
> sharing their life, rather than a mislabeled issue of Doomed Romance."
I agree there. In regards to some lines feeling like petty sniping, well-- look what she has to put up with. :-)
> "Similarly, I quite like Tina's dialogue, especially since it feels much
>
> like the style that a lesser writer would have automatically assigned to
>
> the dude friend without thinking.
That's an interesting comment-- for me, Tina's "voice" and speech pattern is inherently feminine.
> And each of the four characters has a
>
> unique relationship with each of the others - it isn't just dudes with
>
> dudes, ladies with ladies, and people who want to kiss. Overall, it
>
> feels pretty thoroughly person'd."
Thank you very kindly. It's a quality I put conscious effort into putting onto the page, and it is gratifying to have it noticed.
> "Actually, the only bit I have a problem with is the ending, where a
>
> good gag - the ol' 'what's the worst that could happen?'/'WUXTRY WUXTRY
>
> READ ALL ABOUT IT WORST THINGS HAPPEN' - goes on too long and ends up
>
> feeling oddly disproportionate in its consequences."
"Oddly disproportionate" is what I was going for-- things snowballing like crazy. It also was meant as a bit of world-building/house-keeping-- setting up a new "big" conflict that will be a major story arc (Earth versus the Pulse Collective), and new status quos-- the Seven Wonders disbanded, Max and Julie no longer fabulously sheltered/rich, Fahrenheit Man joining the Daylighters (who have "appeared" once before, and are going to be a big deal in coming years/stories).
All that being said, you're quite right I think that all this undermines the gag aspect of it, and perhaps this story as a whole. In retrospect I probably could have and should have found a better way to wrap it up, and to set these little things in motion.
==Tom
More information about the racc
mailing list