[META] Other People's Stories

[Andrew Perron]

On Sun, 15 Aug 2010 22:47:30 +0000 (UTC), Saxon Brenton wrote:

> Well... The answer that Dvandom gave is the most sensible 'broad' answer.
> With regards to the Just Imagine cascade, or indeed any cascade on RACC, 
> I would say that you have a lot of leeway in this.  Simply put, the nature 
> of the story writing process for cascades means that the cascade is 'open'.
> A cascade is expected and indeed *encouraged* to have multiple authors 
> picking up on what has gone before.  Whether that 'openness' should carry 
> through as far as archiving is concerned is admittedly a somewhat different 
> matter.  My guess is that most RACC writers would be more comfortable 
> having a collected cascade be put up in an archive than other writings 
> (especially other serious writings).  So, while I may be wrong about this 
> I would say: yeah, sure, go ahead and put up the whole lot for context purposes.

This makes a lot of sense. Okay, I'll go for it!

> Saxon Brenton
> tV trOpes wiKi  *HUnGeRS*  and wAnts to EaT all yoUr frEe tiMe

Today, the Magic: The Gathering website used the term "Trope Namer".  It's
spreaaaaading

> Think. Green. Do.
> 
> Please consider the environment before printing this email.

Andrew "NO .SIG MAN" "Juan" Perron, time to play that great game for all
ages, Fix That Punctuation!