[NNTP] Babble from Julien ÉLIE
Julien ÉLIE
julien at trigofacile.com
Wed Oct 20 10:44:24 PDT 2010
Hi Charles,
>> * The RFC Editor renamed [I-D.ietf-usefor-useage] this way:
>>
>> [USENET_BP] Lindsey, C., "Usenet Best Practice", Work in Progress,
>> March 2005.
>>
>> Do you think it is OK and better than [USEAGE], as it is worded
>> in RFCs 5536 and 5537? I believe it would be more consistent with [USEAGE].
>> That is what I will ask unless someone replies to explain why [USENET_BP]
>> should be kept.
>
> It should be referenced in exactly the same way as it is referenced in RFC
> 5536 et seq.
Then I will switch to what RFC 5536 uses:
[USEAGE] Lindsey, C., "Usenet Best Practice", Work in Progress,
March 2005.
> Mind you, "in Progress" is likely to be a very long time :-( .
I hope time will not be longer than this other one mentioned
in the references:
[NNTP_LIST] Hernacki, B., "NNTP LIST Additions", Work in Progress,
July 1997.
Anyway, NNTP_LIST is now obsolete and no longer needs work!
What is the next step for USEAGE? What is missing (besides putting
it up to date with latest published RFCs)?
Isn't a -02 already in edition?
--
Julien ÉLIE
« Vulnera dum sanas, dolor est medicina doloris. »
More information about the ietf-nntp
mailing list