[NNTP] LISTGROUP wording
Peter Robinson
pmrobinson at gmx.net
Tue May 10 15:33:40 PDT 2005
Clive D.W. Feather <clive at demon.net> wrote:
> Peter Robinson said:
>
> > On the other hand, requiring servers to store the group name (for GROUP
> > with no parameters or the long changed LISTGROUP response) is a real
> > issue.
>
> The two need to be considered together, I think. If LISTGROUP remains
> changed, the GROUP bit is not significant IMO.
I agree. And I really hope we don't have to backtrack on the LISTGROUP
response, since it's much neater the way we have it now.
Peter
More information about the ietf-nntp
mailing list