[NNTP] Consensus?
Ken Murchison
ken at oceana.com
Thu Aug 11 06:30:20 PDT 2005
Clive D.W. Feather wrote:
> Russ Allbery said:
>
>>>Personally I would like the wording changed to require (a MUST) 32 bit
>>>support and suggest (a SHOULD) 64 bit support.
>>
>>That's two people supporting that option. What does everyone else think
>>about that?
>
>
> I seriously don't like it.
>
> It doesn't represent current practice, which is what we're supposed to be
> documenting.
True, but it sounds like current practice is all over the place (2^31,
2^32, 2^64), so we need to standardize on something. Standardizing on
something that we *know* will break in a few years doesn't seem like the
best move when there is a relatively simple solution which will push the
problem out far enough where most, if not all, of us on this list won't
have to worry about it. ;)
> It introduces an interoperability issue. What happens if the server
> supports the SHOULD and the client doesn't?
Then the client chokes and can't read the group. They are no worse off
then if the server supports your BIGNUM strawman (which I like BTW) and
the client doesn't. The bottom line is that if we recommend 2^64 in
this spec, it gives client authors at *least* two years to upgrade the
code. If they don't upgrade (to 2^64 OR BIGNUM) by the time article
numbers on servers exceed 2^32, I'd consider the clients horribly broken.
> What are the proponents of this proposal actually suggesting for the
> wording?
You must have missed my post on this:
http://lists.eyrie.org/pipermail/ietf-nntp/2005-July/001612.html
We could also add text that states that 2^64-1 will most likely become
mandatory in a future version of the spec.
Having said all of this, if we can't reach a consensus on 2^64
relatively quickly, then lets just go with 2^32 and be done with it. I
don't really like the idea of catering to 2^31 implementations.
--
Kenneth Murchison Oceana Matrix Ltd.
Software Engineer 2495 Main St. - Suite 401
716-604-0088 x26 Buffalo, NY 14214
--PGP Public Key-- http://www.oceana.com/~ken/ksm.pgp
More information about the ietf-nntp
mailing list