[NNTP] Misc changes
Russ Allbery
rra at stanford.edu
Fri Apr 29 09:21:55 PDT 2005
Ade Lovett <ade at lovett.com> writes:
> I also believe that it should be a capability in its own right (ie:
> 'NEWNEWS' instead of 'READER NEWNEWS') -- there's no intrinsic reason
> why the list of message IDs generated would be used for only reader
> purposes -- ditto for NEWGROUPS, whilst the primary reason is
> undoubtedly for client newsreaders, it's not solely a reader command,
> and thus should not be compartmentalized as such.
I would prefer not to fiddle with NEWGROUPS at this point (it doesn't have
its own capability). We have to stop at some point.
Okay, I wanted to see if anyone felt that way about NEWNEWS. I'm happy to
have it be its own capability.
--
Russ Allbery (rra at stanford.edu) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
More information about the ietf-nntp
mailing list