[ietf-nntp] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-nntpext-authinfo-00.txt
Clive D.W. Feather
clive at demon.net
Thu May 20 08:06:58 PDT 2004
Ken Murchison said:
>>> Section 2.2.1: again, drop the generic responses. The responses should
>>> be split by phase, as with POST.
> Split them how? Unless I'm mistaken, none of the responses (including a
> new 481 response) are phase specific for either USER/PASS or SASL. In
> other words, any of the responses are valid at any point in the exchange.
Um, now we've dropped the generics that's so, I think. So forget that
BTW, wouldn't the argument to 283 be better named as something else, since
it's not a challenge. In fact, all of "initial-response",
"base64-final-server-challenge-data", and "base64-server-challenge-data"
would better just be called "SASL-transaction-data". Oh, and if you
disagree with that then the latter two need adding to the "Parameters"
Clive D.W. Feather | Work: <clive at demon.net> | Tel: +44 20 8495 6138
Internet Expert | Home: <clive at davros.org> | Fax: +44 870 051 9937
Demon Internet | WWW: http://www.davros.org | Mobile: +44 7973 377646
Thus plc | |
More information about the ietf-nntp