ietf-nntp UTC (was: Minor corrections to 11.4)
rra at stanford.edu
Fri Sep 1 02:02:25 PDT 2000
Lee Kindness <lkindness at csl.co.uk> writes:
> In addition to your comments, I think it is important that "UTC" is
> dropped from the draft. It does not add anything - it is only a cosmetic
> update. It also introduces incompatibilities.
I don't much care one way or the other; INN 2.3 supports it (and was the
first released version of INN that did so, I believe). It's only
cosmetic, but it's not hard to support in the server.
Russ Allbery (rra at stanford.edu) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
More information about the ietf-nntp