ietf-nntp Draft comments
paulo at turnpike.com
Tue Nov 14 02:09:03 PST 2000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In article <3A102763.7EDB777B at verio.net>, Stan O. Barber <sob at verio.net>
>I have heard nothing since the draft was published at the beginning of the
>month. I know there are a couple of issues that have come up in the past that
>need to be put to bed:
>2. Section 7 -- Streaming .... There was proposed text on this that I didn't
>include in 11. My concern here is including this in the base specification
>rather than putting it in an extension. I think it makes a great extension, but
>I remain concerned about having in the base.
Streaming is widely used today - and it works. As we are codifying
existing practises then I believe that this needs to be addressed (and
permitted) in the base specification.
If relegated to an extension the implication will be that the base
specification disallows streaming.
Paul Overell T U R N P I K E
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPsdk version 1.7.1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the ietf-nntp