ietf-nntp Another message from email@example.com about tin
Clive D.W. Feather
clive at demon.net
Fri Jul 28 08:18:40 PDT 2000
Stan O. Barber said:
> > In addition to this, I think it is important that the new spec
> > mandates this - intelligent/obvious - behaviour:
> > All unrecognised 200 series codes should be assumed as
> > success.
> Seems like a good clarification to me. Any other opinions?
Some time ago I proposed the wording:
If a client receives an unexpected response, it SHOULD use the first
digit to determine what action to take. In most cases, a reasonable
action would be that taken for a valid response with the same first
What is wrong with it ?
Clive D.W. Feather | Work: <clive at demon.net> | Tel: +44 20 8371 1138
Internet Expert | Home: <clive at davros.org> | Fax: +44 20 8371 1037
Demon Internet | WWW: http://www.davros.org | DFax: +44 20 8371 4037
Thus plc | | Mobile: +44 7973 377646
More information about the ietf-nntp