ietf-nntp Section 7.1 - GREETING step.
Stan O. Barber
sob at verio.net
Mon Jul 24 11:27:06 PDT 2000
David Riley wrote:
> I think we should consider present the 200 greeting code if IHAVE transit
> ability is available on the server to the client. The response from MODE
> READER indicates specifically whether the user may use POST or not. I
> would suggest the text be changed to something along the lines of.
I am not sure if this is consistent with RFC977. Comments from others on this
> Also, I can't seem to find older mailing list archives -- why was the 502
> on permission denied, changed to a 504? That does not seem to mimic
> existing practice.
See http://www.academ.com/academ/nntp/ietf/index.html for the archives.
Stan | PGP Key ID: 55CB6421 | Opinions expressed are only mine.
Olan | Phone: +1-713-793-0222 | Email: sob at academ.com
Barber | Fax: +1-713-793-0221 | http://www.academ.com/~sob
More information about the ietf-nntp